Costs and benefits To make a good

mstistiyakhatun

  This way, search engines can crawl the page directly and don't have to wait for a client-side JavaScript. So only one version is used, but the website works faster. Because search engines immediately index the index, the website can rank higher in Google.  When using client side rendering, JavaScript is added to the user's computer and the content can be rendered. This method of rendering provides flexibility and dynamics, but does entail risks.





Search engines have difficulty indexing JavaScript, which can lower the SEO WhatsApp Number List position.  decision between the different rendering methods, you should not only look at the investment, but also at the results of each method. For example, server-side rendering is a bit more expensive, but the SEO results are generally good. Client-side rendering is somewhat cheaper, but also riskier for the SEO position.  Rich Results Test There is another tool that can help determine whether dynamic rendering is needed or not. Google's Rich Results Test checks whether Google can properly view all the content of a page. This tool can also view the rendered HTML (see image below).  






Within HTML you can search for certain content on the page, such as alt attributes or image names. If the desired content is not available, this may be due to JavaScript being served. GoogleBot cannot reach this.  In summary Dynamic rendering can have benefits for SEO, but this method is not without risks, both in terms of costs and results. Consider the costs and benefits and determine whether alternatives such as serverside and client rendering provide the same results.For good SEO optimization, WDF*IDF is very useful. This tool helps understand which words are important and relevant in texts and how it is best tailored to the online world of the industry. The tool therefore influences the quality of the text.